<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counting, Infinity, and the Foundation of Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/2010/01/14/counting-infinity-and-the-foundation-of-knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/2010/01/14/counting-infinity-and-the-foundation-of-knowledge/</link>
	<description>A website dedicated to thinking God&#039;s thoughts after Him.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taking Every Thought Captive</title>
		<link>http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/2010/01/14/counting-infinity-and-the-foundation-of-knowledge/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taking Every Thought Captive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/?p=252#comment-335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for commenting. I think a more fundamental question is why can we describe things we seen in the physical universe in terms of mathematics?  Why is there this apparent &quot;coherence&quot;?  What we are really trying to get it are the metaphysical and epistemelogical issues.  How can an unbelieving worldview account for the coherence between math and the universe?  This is discussed somewhat here:
http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/bible-and-science/

I would like to discuss this more with you if you are interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting. I think a more fundamental question is why can we describe things we seen in the physical universe in terms of mathematics?  Why is there this apparent &#8220;coherence&#8221;?  What we are really trying to get it are the metaphysical and epistemelogical issues.  How can an unbelieving worldview account for the coherence between math and the universe?  This is discussed somewhat here:<br />
<a href="http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/bible-and-science/" rel="nofollow">http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/bible-and-science/</a></p>
<p>I would like to discuss this more with you if you are interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Baker</title>
		<link>http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/2010/01/14/counting-infinity-and-the-foundation-of-knowledge/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/?p=252#comment-325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh for alleged hypothetical supreme being&#039;s sake grow up!  Nonbelievers can count, and account for, infinite sets by simply following the logic.  Peano axioms require an unending sequence to remain contradiction free. As for the Platonic aspect of mathematics even great philosophers screw up. There are no compelling arguments for a platonic or spiritual mathematic world and no amount of pseudo mathematical drivel will provide one. As rather stupid short-lived animals we will never exhaust the consequences of any infinite mathematical theory no matter how well trod upon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh for alleged hypothetical supreme being&#8217;s sake grow up!  Nonbelievers can count, and account for, infinite sets by simply following the logic.  Peano axioms require an unending sequence to remain contradiction free. As for the Platonic aspect of mathematics even great philosophers screw up. There are no compelling arguments for a platonic or spiritual mathematic world and no amount of pseudo mathematical drivel will provide one. As rather stupid short-lived animals we will never exhaust the consequences of any infinite mathematical theory no matter how well trod upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Crider</title>
		<link>http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/2010/01/14/counting-infinity-and-the-foundation-of-knowledge/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin Crider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/?p=252#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, James Nickel has done excellent work in showing the Biblical foundations of mathematics.  Only the believer can truly &quot;account for his counting.&quot;  Thanks for visiting the site and commenting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, James Nickel has done excellent work in showing the Biblical foundations of mathematics.  Only the believer can truly &#8220;account for his counting.&#8221;  Thanks for visiting the site and commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon R. Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/2010/01/14/counting-infinity-and-the-foundation-of-knowledge/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon R. Vaughan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingeverythoughtcaptive.com/?p=252#comment-15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article &amp; a great, simple example of how mathematics is full of spiritual concepts. Even the most basic math taps into profound truths, though it is still practical and useful for many things.

It&#039;s silly to say man created mathematics. Maybe mathematicians think this because they consider math to consist mainly of just definitions that men concocted, but it seems quite obvious that mathematical truths have been discovered over the centuries!

To pretend otherwise is just silly. Considering how long it took just to come up with the concept of zero is a good example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article &amp; a great, simple example of how mathematics is full of spiritual concepts. Even the most basic math taps into profound truths, though it is still practical and useful for many things.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s silly to say man created mathematics. Maybe mathematicians think this because they consider math to consist mainly of just definitions that men concocted, but it seems quite obvious that mathematical truths have been discovered over the centuries!</p>
<p>To pretend otherwise is just silly. Considering how long it took just to come up with the concept of zero is a good example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

